The United Health Foundation published its annual health rankings (see Figure 1) and the healthiest state in 2017 was Massachusetts. The Commonwealth has been steadily moving up the list since 1990. Rounding out the top 5 of the health rankings are Hawaii, Vermont, Utah, and Connecticut.
There are a number of factors that impact each state’s ranking, including tobacco use, obesity, poverty rates, education levels, chronic disease prevalence, and the percentage of residents with health insurance coverage.
The least healthy state is Mississippi, followed by Louisiana, Arkansas, Alabama, and West Virginia. According to the report, Mississippi and Louisiana have major health challenges, including a high prevalence of smoking, obesity, and children in poverty.
Americans have an average life expectancy of 78.8 years (CDC), which is much lower than other developed countries like Japan, Iceland, and Israel. But we tend to live longer than residents of Denmark, Mexico, and China. Life expectancy is also impacted by the state we live in (see Figure 2).
Hawaii residents live the longest, on average 81.3 years. Folks from Mississippi aren’t so lucky; their life expectancy is only 74.7 years.
It’s not surprising that residents of wealthier counties and regions have longer life spans, but I was shocked at how wide the gap can be for people living a few blocks apart. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation created an online tool to show how long people are living in your neighborhood. Just input your zip code and you’ll get the results.
Healthcare costs continue to rise, with the average American spending more than $10,000 on healthcare (CMS). What we pay depends on where we live. Figure 3 shows the 5 states where health insurance premiums are the highest and lowest (SHADAC). The amount workers pay out-of-pocket for single person coverage under employer-sponsored healthcare plans also varies by state, as shown in Figure 4 (SHADAC).
Read my previous blog Is Cost-Shifting Reducing Your Healthcare Costs in the Long-Run to learn more.
Healthcare costs are rising across the board. Primary care and specialty physician office visits are no exception. Employees are also shouldering a larger burden of the cost in the form of copays, as shown in Figure 5 (SHADAC).
The increasing burden of cost sharing has caused some people to postpone medical care. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, the states where people are most likely to postpone doctor visits (see Figure 6) are:
Because the number of healthcare facilities and providers varies by state, it’s no surprise that the quality of care delivered also varies. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality created State Snapshots, an interactive tool that assesses 3 dimensions of care quality: type of care (such as preventive or chronic), care setting (like hospitals or nursing homes) and clinical areas (such as patients with cancer or diabetes).
The states with the highest quality of care include:
I was really curious to learn how geography can influence health care costs and hope you found it interesting. I also hope the results of my curiosity show that local, regional, and national data can help you benchmark how your benefits programs are performing, but it can’t tell you why your programs are performing the way they are. For that, you need data specific to your population. Is poor health to blame for increased workers’ compensation rates? Are your employees postponing care because they can’t afford the out-of-pocket costs?
If you can’t answer specific questions like these, you’re blindly making changes to your benefits programs. You use data in all other areas of your business to make decisions. It’s time to use data to target the real issues driving your costs and member health outcomes.